"Thank you so much for all your guidance and support during this difficult period in my life.I Will Never Forget Your Compassionate Professionalism And Unparalleled Legal Expertise." -Zachary P..
"From the 1st meeting, he invested so much time & interest. He was so helpful & reassuring. We won in court." -Ina Lerner.
"They’re the best. You will never lose with them" -Ana Thomas.
"Their services were honest with integrity. I always walked out their office with a smile." -Damilola Adeyale.
"I had a tough case in the beginning but it ended wonderfully and I grossed more than I expected. I recommend each & everyone who has an accident or any other legal matters, to please call Duboff & Assoc." -Terrence Edwards.
"The service was great and very understanding and straight forward all the way to the end." -Kevin Hines.
"I had a great experience working with Duboff & Associates through my legal case. I was involved in a car accident by a tuck tractor at no fault of mine. Mr. Duboff was such pleasant person that he guided me through the process and through by medical care." -Mohamed A..
"We are most grateful to you personally as well as your entire staff at DuBoff & Associates. Had it not been for your legal expertise, our opponents would have prevailed. The series of meetings we had–especially on Sundays to accommodate our individual schedules and our witnesses–deserve special mention." -Isaac Vodi, Riteway Driving School.
"I will not hesitate to refer them to my friends and I have done it before. Again I am very pleased for the good service they provided me. I will always come back for future incident." -Read the full testimonial.
"You have been great to work with, you are a top notch attorney in my opinion. This is my first experience and hopefully my last but I appreciate your openness, patience, and honesty in guiding me through the process. You always made me feel you were working on my behalf to get the best settlement possible." -Larry McClain.
Riding bicycles is always a fun way to get exercise, not to mention it’s great for the environment when you bike as your way of commuting to and from work. Unfortunately, biking can also pretty dangerous no matter where you are throughout the state of Maryland.
That’s exactly why bicyclists and vehicle drivers must work together in order to keep Maryland’s roads safer. It’s important to first and foremost distinguish that bikes are considered vehicles in Maryland, so bicyclists must adhere to the same amount of care and attention as motor vehicle operators. On the other hand, motorists must also give cyclists the same amount of respect that they would provide to another vehicle.
It’s a distinct rule that motorists should provide at least three feet of space between cyclists when passing. Motorists can also do their due diligence in terms of keeping the roads safer by stopping for cyclists at crosswalks and always being prepared for when they may make turns. Bicyclists should also always wear a proper helmet, be as visible as possible, and be aware of their surroundings to do their due diligence towards safer roads.
At DuBoff & Associates, our highly experienced team of bicycle accident specialists is here to help you through these tricky legal scenarios. In this article we are going to go over Maryland’s bicycle laws so you can be more cognizant towards the rules of the road that everyone must obey when riding a bike.
By Maryland law, bicyclists are legally authorized users of every roadway, and bicyclists have the same rights-of-way and general duty to obey traffic signals as all motorists. But of course, bicycles are much less visible than cars, they’re quiet, and they don’t have any type of protective barrier to support a cyclist in the case of an accident, which is why all motorists must drive carefully around cyclists.
As we mentioned above, bicyclists in Maryland in general must adhere to the same rights and duties as motor vehicle drivers.
It’s crucial to know your legal rights and obligations while cycling throughout Maryland. The following is a list of laws you should always keep in mind while riding your bike:
Helmets are required for all bike operators and passengers under 16-years-old.
Maryland’s general DUI statute is the same as it applies to those riding bicycles.
Bicyclists must always ride with the flow of traffic as close as they can to the right side of a roadway.
Cyclists are allowed full lane use within certain situations, including when they are traveling at the same speed as traffic, on a one-way street, passing another motor vehicle or bicycle, preparing to turn, avoiding certain hazards within the road, or biking in a lane that is simply too narrow to share.
There are local ordinances throughout Maryland that may permit bicyclists to ride on sidewalks, but throughout the entire state cyclists must always yield to the right of way of pedestrians while on a sidewalk.
It is illegal for anyone to open a motor vehicle door with the intention of striking or interfering with a bicyclist in any way.
It’s required that cyclists ride in a bike lane when it’s available, but they are allowed to exit the bike lane when they are passing other cyclists, preparing to make a turn or avoiding any kind of hazards on the road.
Bicyclists must always come to full stops at stop signs and must adhere to red lights.
Bicyclists must always utilize hand or arm signals when they are stopping or making a turn, and it’s best to begin making these signals around 100 feet before the turn (if it’s safe to do so).
Motor vehicles must always give a minimum of 3 feet of space when they are passing a bicyclist on the road.
A motor vehicle driver should also always be able to see passed the bicyclist in their rearview mirror before returning to the original lane, and this includes ensuring you are clear of the recently passed bicyclist before conducting any turns.
The general rule is that cyclists must exercise extreme care when passing motor vehicles.
The law here is that bicycles are only allowed to ride next to each other in groups of two, and they generally cannot impede motor vehicle traffic.
The following are some tips to keep in mind while you’re out on the road here in Maryland:
If you or a loved one were injured in a biking accident, then it’s important to retain a Maryland personal injury attorney who can help you better understand your legal rights and get you on the right track towards your rightful compensation. Our team of specialists is always here for you when you need us most, so contact DuBoff & Associates, CHTD to schedule a free consultation with one of our skilled lawyers.
One of the most significant things you can do to support your personal injury case is to choose the right legal representation, and by hiring the very best attorney for the job you’ll be able to reap the benefits of the expertise and support that’s needed for more optimal outcomes.
There are always going to be many factors and considerations you’ll have to take into account when it comes to hiring your attorney, but the process of deciphering your best options is many times straightforward. There’s no denying how rigorous the researching and interviewing can be when it comes to these types of hiring decisions, so we’ve provided the following factors to help you better understand if a certain lawyer is the perfect choice for your case.
We are more than confident in the capabilities of all our attorneys, and by going through this article we are confident you’ll be even more rest assured that we have what it takes to provide your case with the utmost, professional care that drives the most favorable results.
As always, feel free to contact us with any questions you may have about how our firm can help you and your case. We know you’ll have plenty of questions after going through the following list of things to look for in your personal injury attorney, so we’re always available to talk and help you schedule a free consultation.
We fully understand how important your case is to you, so we advise you to consider the following factors/criteria when you’re looking for a personal injury attorney:
You’re undoubtedly going to come across some law firms and lawyers who try to do it all, so it’s important to hone in on an attorney who primarily focuses on specific areas of the law, in this case personal injury law. The main reason for this is because personal injury law is very intricate and many times entails specialized practices and rules, so you’re never going to want to hire a ‘Jack of all trades, but Master of None’. When it comes down to it, you’ll always be risking the overall quality of your legal representation when you choose an attorney who isn’t a personal injury law expert.
Here at DuBoff & Associates, we specialize in serving injury and accident victims throughout Maryland, Virginia and the D.C. Metro Area. Some of our more popular practice areas include bicycle accidents, car accidents, motorcycle accidents, product liability, medical malpractice and so much more within personal injury law!
There are countless lawyers out there who claim to exclusively deal with personal injury cases, but in reality they’ve never been inside a courtroom. This is because they’ll take on your case and then put pressure on you to settle for a meager amount from insurance companies.
There’s no denying how aggressive insurance companies are, and they know which lawyers and firms are more than willing to take cases to trial, and which lawyers tend to settle quickly. This is sometimes an overlooked aspect of personal injury law, but it really is crucial to hire an attorney who has ample experience taking cases to trial because you’ll ultimately be putting your case at a huge disadvantage without this type of legal experience supporting you.
Personal injury cases always affect you and your family, and they’re so crucial because these types of cases are your opportunity to be rightfully compensated for all the damages a specific injury created. If you’re undergoing a serious injury, it’s imperative that you hire an attorney who you know can deliver a large settlement.
Not every case is worth $1 million and more, but you shouldn’t be afraid to ask prospective attorneys about their biggest cases and reach out for past client referrals. By going through an attorney’s past, you’ll get a much better indication as to their previous accomplishments and overall track record, which will help you decipher if the attorney can deliver the type of settlement or trial verdict you’re after.
One of the many reasons why you should always choose a personal injury expert is because these types of cases will many times require rigorous investigations that are expensive to prepare and conduct. Countless personal injury cases will require attorneys to devote a lot of time solely to one case, and attorneys will many times need to have the resources available to hire all types of medical experts, economists, accident reconstructionists, rehabilitation specialists and life care planners to collaborate with on your behalf.
There are many instances in which properly preparing a personal injury case can exceed $100,000, so you’ll want to ensure that your attorney has the necessary financial resources to successfully prepare your case.
There are a lot of personal injury law firms that try to represent both accident victims and insurance companies, but you should always avoid firms that try to have it both ways.
It’s crucial to understand where your attorney’s loyalty rests, so you’ll be putting your case in better hands by choosing a firm that only represents accident victims.
A contingency fee essentially entails an agreement that you’ll not pay attorney fees unless you recover compensation for your case’s damages. You can be more rest assured in your attorney’s confidence and belief in your case when you hire someone who consents to work for a contingency fee.
We are by far one of the most reputable personal injury law firms in the region that’s comprised of Silver Spring, Bowie, College Park, Landover and Upper Marlboro Injury & Accident Attorneys who have been helping accident victims receive their rightful compensation for decades.
If you have any further questions for us and would like to learn more about how we can support you and your case, don’t hesitate to contact us so we can begin the first steps towards achieving your optimal case results!
A proposed Michigan bill could lower the official drunk driving level to .05, which would make Michigan one of two states (including Utah) in the country to have a drunk driving threshold below the .08 norm. The legislation introduced in late March by Rep. Abdullah Hammoud, D-Dearborn, has since seen leaping bounds of support throughout the entire state.
“We must address drunk driving, which is a completely avoidable epidemic,” said Rep. Hammoud in a recent news release. “As a former public health professional, I am motivated by facts and statistics, and as a legislator I know our current policies in place to prevent drunk driving aren’t working, which is why we must do more.”
Many other countries around the world have lowered their rates of drunk driving by lowering the legal driving BAC level to .05, and in 2013 the National Transportation Safety Board also suggested that every state lower the legal BAC level to .05. This is partly where Hammoud’s ‘Drink OR Drive’ campaign derived inspiration from to genuinely believe that Michigan constituents will not only pass these bills, but will truly benefit from the switch.
Hammoud has also cited studies that suggest that around 11% of all nationwide drunk driving fatalities (about 1,500 lives) would be saved if the entire country adopted this BAC reduction.
Here in Maryland we have the newly created Noah’s Law, which also strictly enforces DUI penalties and has largely expanded the presence of Maryland’s Ignition Interlock Program. Noah’s Law has been in effect since October 2016, and it largely requires convicted DUI drivers, DWI drivers with child passengers and DUI/DWI drivers who inflicted a life-threatening motor vehicle accident to utilize an ignition interlock device for a specifically mandated period of time.
Maryland’s general crackdown on drunk drivers over the past few years has instituted a significant increase in DUI punishments, but many local legislators throughout Maryland, D.C. and the Greater Virginia Area are currently looking to Michigan’s potential BAC legal limit decrease as an example to potentially follow to further prevent people from considering a drink or two before driving.
Another bill within Rep. Hammoud’s legislation package requires people who are convicted of their first DUI charge to utilize an ignition interlock device in order to continue driving. The main reason why Hammoud introduced this second bill is because of the fact that many people ignore their license suspensions after being convicted of drunk driving, and because studies have suggested it makes people much less likely to reoffend.
Hammoud was also inspired by the deaths of the Abbas family, who were killed by being impacted by a drunk driver going down the opposite direction on I-75 near Lexington, Kentucky.
“These proposals will help change behaviors, and they are backed by the science, and they are backed by the leading experts combating drunk driving across our country,” Hammoud said.
Some of the leading experts Hammoud cited include major groups like:
These groups are part of the team that has estimated an 11% decrease in fatal alcohol crashes across the country, if the entire country jumps on the lower BAC threshold bandwagon.
Helen Witty, the nationwide president for Mothers Against Drunk Driving, is encouraging Michigan and many other states to adopt the .05 change.
“Research shows that critical driving skills are impaired at .05 BAC, significantly increasing the risk of a horrible, 100% preventable crash,” Witty said. “We want to do anything we can to support states that are trying to stop these tragedies and keep drunk drivers off the road.”
As of right now the only sponsors of this stricter DUI bill are Democrats, and it’s still uncertain as to whether or not Republicans nationwide will support these types of measures. The American Beverage Institute has publicly come out against Hammoud’s plan stating that the bills are
“shifting to those who enjoy a drink or two over dinner – a group that is not overrepresented in traffic accidents.”
In order for these proposed bills to become law, they will have to pass the Michigan state House, state Senate and then be signed by Governor Gretchen Whitmer.
The attorneys at DuBoff & Associates have ample experience dealing with victims of drunk driving accidents, so we fully believe that lowering legal BAC levels can potentially have a profound impact in terms of saving lives and keeping drivers safer on the road.
There are always many factors that come into play in terms of determining who’s at fault in a car accident, and when it comes to left-hand turn accidents there tends to be a false assumption that the driver conducting the left-hand turn is always at fault.
Of course this isn’t always the case because all circumstances are different, but there still is a predominant legal misconception within these scenarios because left-hand turns typically require drivers to yield the right of way. It’s always perfectly reasonable to expect drivers making left-hand turns to yield to oncoming traffic, but the liability within some of these types of accidents is sometimes more difficult to determine than most would initially think.
We are proud to support our clients through these confusing personal injury cases, and we fully understand how difficult it can be to prove that the other driver not making a left turn was at fault in these types of scenarios. So what we’ve done in this article is provide you with everything you need to know in terms of determining fault if you find yourself involved in a left-hand turn accident by making the turn or driving straight.
As always, if you have any questions for us don’t hesitate to contact us for a free consultation so we can better understand your case and start making the initial steps towards legal action.
The driver who is trying to make a left-hand turn must always yield to other vehicles, unless the left-turning vehicle has the right of way (green arrow). For the most part, drivers must always properly wait to make left turns until there is no oncoming traffic, or the traffic is at least a safe distance away to allow for the left turn.
It’s also very important for left-turn drivers to remember that they must always wait for cyclists and pedestrians to cross a street or crosswalk safely, but there are some liability differences when a cyclist or pedestrian illegally enters a crosswalk and the driver doesn’t have enough time to stop.
It’s never legal for a left-hand turning driver to cut off oncoming traffic, and this is always a very risky maneuver that does many times lead to collisions. There are many left-hand turn accidents that occur in places where a stoplight isn’t present, and in these places it’s always the responsibility of the left-turning driver to take the necessary precautions before initiating the turn. The oncoming traffic always has the right of way in these situations, which is why left-turning drivers are often initially deemed at fault for these types of accidents.
There are instances in which the left-turning driver isn’t liable for the accident’s occurrence, and this typically is when the driver making the left turn has the right of way. Some examples of this can be when a green left turn arrow is provided, or when a driver runs a red light and impacts the car making the left turn.
Other drivers besides the left-turning driver may be liable for the accident if they are found to be rolling through stop signs, texting and driving, or any other kind of distracted driving. But in legal terms, the liability of these types of accidents will come down to the right of way, each driver’s duties on the road, and what a reasonable and prudent driver would have done in the same type of scenario.
There are also liability situations in which the other driver not making the turn simply was acting negligently or driving recklessly. An example of this would be if the other driver was speeding well over the speed limit and made it difficult for the left-turning driver to gauge the safety of their impending turn.
Unexpected circumstances are always at play when it comes to causing left-turning drivers to swerve or come to a stop while executing their turn, and in certain situations these third parties can be found liable for the accident’s occurrence.
If the other driver going straight was intoxicated or negligent in any way then this could also be a factor in determining at least partial fault for the accident.
No matter which side of the table you’re on in these scenarios, it’s crucial for everyone to know how to prove fault within left-turn accident lawsuits. This can include physical evidence like the debris that’s left on the road after the accident, the resting positions of each vehicle after the crash, and any kind of camera footage that may be helpful in determining the liability of what happened. There’s no doubt about it that collecting this type of evidence is somewhat difficult, especially in more rural areas where traffic cameras aren’t available.
Once any kind of left-hand turn accident occurs, it’s always important to call the police immediately and have them come conduct an official accident report. If you’re capable of doing so, it’s also a good idea to take pictures of the accident scene and your injuries as soon as possible. The timeliness of these pictures is crucial because the police may be required to move the crashed vehicles out of the street, which could potentially destroy valuable evidence that would help your case.
No matter what, you should always reach out to one of our attorneys as soon as possible when you’re involved in a left-hand turn accident. By going through our free consultation process we’ll be able to help determine your best course of legal action and begin building a strategy that will help you prove that the other driver was at fault for the damages done to you and your passengers.
Legal jargon can be confusing for everyone, and torts and crimes are technical terms in the legal world that are often misunderstood and improperly overlapped with one another. Tort and criminal law are especially difficult to distinguish from one another, so in this article we are setting the record straight and providing you with everything you need to know about both legal fields.
Here are the fundamentals:
By understanding the basic principles associated with each field of law, you’ll be able to have a much clearer understanding between the differences of torts and crimes, so let’s dig deeper…
A tort is a private breach of someone else’s civil rights, and in the legal world a tort is what occurs when someone’s negligence directly causes damage to a person and/or their property. There are all types of torts, but every tort directly results in the injury to a person or damage to a person’s property.
Negligence is one of the most common causes of torts, but there are distinct differences between unintentional and intentional torts. An example of an unintentional tort would be someone being injured by a faulty product or someone’s pet, while an intentional tort could comprise of something like defamation of character or battery. Typically, the injured party will sue the tortfeasor (person who committed a tort) for damages to a person’s health or their property that was derived from the tortfeasor’s negligent behavior.
Intentional torts are often confused with crimes, and this is probably because these types of torts will coincide with criminal behavior. But if an injured individual decides to sue for compensation purposes, then the case is brought to a civil court (as opposed to criminal court) and the criminal case becomes a tort. Some of the best examples of torts can be seen within all aspects of personal injury law, including car accidents, medical malpractice, product liability, workplace accidents and essentially all of our many practice areas.
One example of a tort being involved with criminal activity is when a drunk driver causes bodily harm and property damage to another individual involved in an accident. In this situation, the crime is the drinking and driving and the tort is the injury sustained by the victim.
The following are the main reasons why torts are illegal:
The generic definition of a crime is any kind of wrongdoing that affects society, and crimes are always identified via a state’s legal system and prosecuted accordingly to a state’s laws and criminal court procedures. In many personal injury situations, an injured party is technically classified as the society and the criminal laws broken were ultimately set up to protect members of society.
Crimes are always brought to justice within criminal courts of law, and the punishment that is given to the criminal will fit the structure that was set up by the state’s criminal laws. Crimes are always punishable acts that go against the laws that are established to keep peace and the protection of all people.
The following are the main reasons why crimes are illegal acts:
We are a team of Silver Spring, Bowie, College Park, Landover and Upper Marlboro Injury & Accident Attorneys who have become experts within ever aspect of personal injury law, and it’s through our multiple decades of combined experience representing our clients that we’ve been able to successfully distinguish the primary differences between torts and crimes. The three main differences include the following:
A tort is something that is classified as a wrongdoing against an individual, while a crime is classified as an illegal act that affects the entire social order our communities live within.
Torts can be unintentional, and many times they involve accidents caused by negligence. This negligence certainly can still cause serious damage to the accident victim(s), which is why torts are tried in civil court and compensation is metered out based on the victim’s losses due to damages and the measure of wrongs involved with the tort.
A crime is an intentional, planned wrongdoing that affects society. There are situations in which an innocent individual may suffer during criminal activities, but usually crimes are a direct act against the law that aim to gain in some way from the specific wrongdoing.
The ways in which torts and crimes affect society differ, but the impact is always going to be negative no matter what the circumstances are.
A tort is something that ultimately distresses the well being of another individual who then seeks out legal action and other forms of compensation.
A crime affects society on a more grand scale, and the criminal laws established within any given state will make certain that criminals are adequately punished for their committed crimes.
There are situations in which torts and crimes coincide with each other within the same criminal activity, and this predominately entails an individual being injured on the scene of a crime due to the criminal’s illegal activity.
We understand how difficult it can be to determine your best course of legal action when you’re involved in an accident of any kind, which is why we always offer free consultations so you can provide us with the details of your case and we can begin taking the necessary first steps towards legal recourse.